A deleted post allegedly made by has stirred reactions online after she reportedly accused fellow Obidient supporter of receiving payment to mobilize supporters during the 2023 court hearings.

She allegedly claimed she paid him ₦100,000 for mobilization efforts linked to the post-election legal proceedings.

Why It’s Trending

The controversy is drawing attention because the Obidient movement publicly projected itself as largely volunteer-driven and grassroots-based during and after the 2023 elections.

Allegations of paid mobilization therefore sparked debate online about:

• activism vs political organizing

• volunteerism in political movements

• internal disagreements among supporters

Important Context

The post was reportedly deleted, and claims circulating online should be treated cautiously unless independently verified by those involved.

Political movements often involve:

• logistics coordination

• transportation support

• event mobilization

But online disputes can quickly amplify claims without full context.

Bigger Picture

What began as a disagreement between supporters has now become part of a wider conversation about transparency, loyalty, and internal tensions within political movements built heavily on social media energy.

For now, it remains another example of how quickly private political disagreements can spill into public view online.